Too late to transition?

By Constance Carlson

Edited by Kristine Moncada, Gigi DiGiacomo, Craig Sheaffer and Nicole Tautges

Updated 2026 (originally published 2017)

This narrative is a decision case study based on a real-life story of farmers in the Upper Midwest. It was developed for use by extension educators, post-secondary instructors, state agency personnel, and others interested in learning about the process of transitioning to organic farming.

Please note that while this case describes an actual situation, names have been changed.

A man holding a small child next to a vintage tractor in the 1930s.

Case overview

In this case, an experienced farming family weighs the pros and cons of transitioning to certified organic production given the extra labor and risk associated with organic.

Case objectives

  • Increase knowledge of the steps for transitioning to organics
  • Understand the challenges of transitioning to organic later in farming career
  • Gain understanding of the resources for transitioning farmers to find mentors and additional information

Dilemma

Eric and Angie Foster grew up in a small farming community in west central Minnesota. Eric had learned to farm by working with his father and brothers on the family farm while growing up. Eric and Angie met in high school and married shortly after graduation. For several years, they lived in a city a few hours from their hometown where they started to raise a family while Eric worked in sales. They had moved away from their small town because, as a young couple, they couldn’t afford to buy their own farmland and Eric’s father was still farming the family land. About ten years after moving away, Eric’s brother, Jack, bought a piece of land near their father’s farm. Shortly thereafter, a farm a few miles from both Jack and Andrew’s land came up for rent. Eric and Angie’s families encouraged them to come back home and start farming as a family again. Eric and Angie decided the time was right to go back to their roots.

Farming during Eric’s early years back on the farm was a time of great change and expansion in the U.S. farm industry. Farmers were shifting from growing a variety of crops to a standard rotation of corn and soybeans. Farmers across the U.S. have witnessed great changes in agricultural production over the past fifty years. Farmers like Eric and Jack, who were raised on a farm in the fifties, may have been witness to the very last of horse-powered production and have farmed long enough to now be using GPS in their tractors! They have also witnessed and been part of the dramatic change in nutrient and pest pressure management. Figures 1 and 2 show the rise in chemical inputs, especially since the early '70s. With nearly 100% of the corn acreage of the past thirty years produced using conventional methods, it’s evident why switching from conventional to organic production is not an easy decision--many farmers simply do not have the experience or knowledge to farm any other way.
 

Line graph showing percentage increase of planted acres from 1952 to 2007.
Figure 1. Percent corn acreage treated with herbicides in U.S. agriculture, 1952-2008. Corn acreage with herbicide increased from under 20% in 1952 to nearly all acreage treated with herbicides by the 1980s. Source: USDA-ERS, 2016.

 

Line graph showing U.S. fertilizer usage from 1960 to 2011, trending upward.
Figure 2. Fertilizer use in millions of tons in U.S. agriculture, 1960-2011. In 1960, fertilizer use was about 7,500 million tons. By the 1970s, it had risen to 20,000 million tons and has been in the same range since 2011. Source: USDA-ERS, 2016.

More and more farms were moving toward what we now call “conventional” farming practices—using synthetic fertilizers to manage nutrient needs and pesticides to manage insect and weed pressures. After a few years of renting, Eric and Angie were able to purchase land, and their enterprise grew to about 300 acres. Like other farmers in the Midwest, they farmed conventionally growing corn and soybeans. They also managed a 300-head farrow-to-finish hog operation.

While Eric decided to adopt conventional farming methods, his brother Jack decided to farm using organic methods. This was an unusual choice at the time because national organic standards and best management practices had not yet been formally established. Jack and Eric would often talk about their farming challenges and, though they had different farming methods, they enjoyed problem solving together and often shared equipment and labor. These benefits helped Eric and Angie weather the ups and down of farming, raise their family, send their kids to college, and enjoy their lives as farmers in the community.

Too late to change? 

The years passed and each family member managed his farm in his own way. Eric sold his hog operation and farming methods continued to change to meet the market challenges and consumer demands. One of the biggest changes that occurred was the dramatic growth in demand for organics. As the organic market steadily grew, Jack tried to convince Eric to start converting his acres to organic. Jack offered to mentor him through the organic transition process, showing him how to apply for certification and helping him to manage weeds and pests without the aid of chemical inputs. See The Path to Organic Certification from the Organic Farming Research Foundation for resources on transitioning to organic farming.

Eric and Angie were both nearing retirement age and were concerned about work load, land values and the future of their farm. They now owned their acres and wanted to see the farm stay in the family. However, only one of their sons, Daniel, was a farmer. Over the years, Daniel had grown to become an important part of the resource and labor sharing between the families, but, like his father, he farmed conventionally. If they transitioned to organic, how willing would Daniel be to farm organically?  Would this be a barrier for him to continue to work the family farm?

Eric also wasn’t convinced that the prices were worth the effort and work required to change his farming methods. Organic prices for corn and soybean were usually at least twice as much as for conventional (Figures 3 and 4). He knew, from talking with Jack, that he wouldn’t be able to sell his crops as organic for the three-year organic transition period, and that their operation might suffer financially (Table 1).  
 

Line graph showing organic and conventional corn prices from 2011 to 2016.
Figure 3. Organic versus conventional corn prices in $ per bushel for the period of time of this decision case (2011-2016). Organic corn is generally about twice the price as conventional. In 2016, organic corn was around $8 per bushel, while conventional corn was $3 per bushel. Source: Center for Farm Financial Management’s FINBIN database.

 

Line graph showing organic and conventional soybean prices from 2011 to 2016.
Figure 4. Organic versus conventional soybean prices in $/bushel for the period of time of this decision case (2011-2016). Organic soybean is generally about twice the price as conventional. In 2016, organic soybean was over $19 per bushel, while conventional soybean was $9 per bushel. Source: Center for Farm Financial Management’s FINBIN database.
Table 1. The table below shows the loss a typical farmer may incur during the three years of transition for the period of time of this decision case, 2014-2016. 2016 yields and prices were estimated. Average direct and overhead expenses reported by transitioning farmers in Minnesota for the 2015 Farm Business Management program, FINBIN database.
ItemField 1: Corn (50% of farm)Field 2: Food-grade soybeans (50% of farm)Annual average
Acres115115230
Yield15034n/a
Price$3.75$14.40n/a
Gross income$64,745$56,350$120,992
Average gross income per acre$563$490$526
Average expenses per acre$718$400$612
Average net income per acre‒ $155$90‒ $86

After watching his brother farm, Eric knew that organic farming was more labor-intensive, requiring more frequent field scouting, equipment cleaning, and hands-on management compared to his current conventional system. He was concerned about whether he’d be able to physically handle the extra work. He was especially worried about weed management. He had a low tolerance for weeds in his fields and wasn’t convinced he could manage them in an organic system. He wasn’t getting any younger and had no interest in “walking the rows” —manually pulling or chopping weeds.  

However, Eric and Angie were also people who loved the outdoors. They enjoyed nature, were avid hunters and had raised their kids to be the same. Both Eric and Angie enjoyed watching the colorful birds who came to the feeders around their house. Over time, Eric noticed they just weren’t coming around like they used to. He commented to Jack later that, “The farm was silent. No birds. No songs. It was eerie.” It raised real concerns about the chemicals being sprayed on the acres around their house and how they were caring for the natural environment around them. They considered how transitioning to organic farming might benefit the wildlife they loved so much.

Are the benefits of stronger market prices and less pesticide exposure enough to outweigh the extra work and financial uncertainty of transitioning to organic production?  Was it too late to make the change to organic? Would their son Daniel be interested in farming organically? 

Discussion questions

  1. What are the barriers to transitioning to organic that Eric and Angie are facing?
  2. What are the benefits for them to transition?
  3. How does age factor into their decision?
  4. What is important to Eric and Angie as farmers?  
  5. What are Eric’s feelings regarding organic farming? How might his feelings affect their decision?
  6. How important might having a mentor be for success in organic farming?
  7. Why might it be important to know whether their son plans to take over the farm when they retire?
  8. If you were in their situation, what would you do?


Epilogue for Too late to transition?

Print version (Google Doc)

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Organic Transitions Program under award number 2013-51106-21005.

This project was also supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program under the Transition to Organic Partnership Program (TOPP) in the Midwest region.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.